Pulling a mock server for your APIs out of thin air

Table of contents

Summary

A couple of days ago, marcushg mentioned on the #servant IRC channel that one could probably easily use the information available from API types to “derive” a mock implementation of your request handlers that just generates random values of whatever the return type of the handlers are. Julian and I discussed this a bit today and I just went ahead and wrote down our thoughts in a new branch. The result will be explained in this post, but in short, it lets us take a type describing a web API, such as:

type API = "user" :> Get '[JSON] User

and generate request handlers that just respond with random values of the appropriate type, User in our case. In servant/wai terms, this means we get a mock function with the type:

mock :: HasMock api => Proxy api -> Server api

i.e., “given an API type, please generate a mock server for such an API”. This effectively means “please pull a mock server out of thin air for me”.

Out of thin air, really? Not exactly. But let’s start by clearly stating the problem.

The Problem

servant lets you describe web applications with a Haskell type using the combinators from servant’s type-level EDSL. Such a type would be:

-- In English:
-- the API has one endpoint, under /user, which returns
-- response bodies in JSON that describe values of type User
type API = "user" :> Get '[JSON] User

where User could be defined as:

newtype User = User { username :: String }

The goal would be to “automagically” derive a request handler of the right type that we could use as a placeholder until we properly implement a handler that talks to the database and responds with “the real data”.

For anyone not familiar with servant already, you just need to know that it means we need to somehow automatically implement a computation with the type:

getUser :: EitherT ServantErr IO User

possibly by constraining the user to provide an instance for some random generation class.

The Plan

Just like servant-server, servant-client and others, we need a class whose instances will define the way we interpret each combinator, in a way very specific to this task: we will produce what servant-server takes as input, i.e., request handlers! This all means we are basically looking at a class like:

class HasServer api => HasMock api where
  mock :: Proxy api -> Server api

where Server api just computes the types of the all the request handlers of an API type. In our case, Server api is computed as follows:

-- api = the API type from above in our case
Server API = Server ("user" :> Get '[JSON] User)
           -- static strings in the path do not influence
           -- the type of a handler
           = Server (Get '[JSON] User)
           -- EitherT ServantErr IO is the default monad
           -- in which handlers run
           = Either ServantErr IO User

So we have to implement at least support for static string fragments in the path and the Get combinator (i.e handlers for HTTP GET requests).

HasMock instances

Let’s start with the one for static path fragments, it’s the simplest one: we ignore the string bit and move on to what comes after.

instance (KnownSymbol path, HasMock rest) => HasMock (path :> rest) where
  mock _ = mock (Proxy :: Proxy rest)

Don’t be scared by KnownSymbol, it basically just means “path is a type-level string”, that is, a string that appears in a type.

Next comes the one for Get. This one is trickier: this is the combinator that says what type the handler returns. The returned value then gets encoded into JSON, HTML, CSV or any format of your choice. In our case, the handler returns a User and can only encode it in the JSON format.

Now the heart of the matter really is: we know we need to return an User and our EitherT ServantErr IO monad mentions IO, couldn’t we randomly generate an User? Yes, we can! For the purpose of a mock server, we will simply use QuickCheck’s Arbitrary class, which represents types for which we can generate random values, given a random number generator.

class Arbitrary a where
  arbitrary :: Gen a
  -- and another method, but optional

The Gen type provides instances for the Functor, Applicative and Monad classes and Arbitrary comes with instances for many of the types in base.

This essentially means writing an Arbitrary instance for User is as simple as:

instance Arbitrary User where
  -- we just rely on the arbitrary instance for lists of
  -- chars, i.e., Strings, and use the Functor instance for Gen
  arbitrary = fmap User arbitrary

If you have multiple fields, you can use the usual combo of <$> (i.e., fmap) and <*> (comes with Applicative).

-- a point: x, y coordinates
data Point = Point Double Double

instance Arbitrary Point where
  arbitrary = Point <$> arbitrary <*> arbitrary

Once you have an Arbitrary instance, in order to generate a random value using your instance, you have to call a function called… generate!

generate :: Gen a -> IO a

Putting the two together, we get:

generate arbitrary :: Arbitrary a => IO a

All we need to do is just “lift” that up into our EitherT ServantErr IO monad, which is exactly what Control.Monad.IO.Class.liftIO is about in the transformers package.

liftIO (generate arbitrary) :: Arbitrary a => EitherT ServantErr IO a

In order to automatically “fill” request handlers with this expression we just need to write the HasMock instance for Get, shown below.

instance (Arbitrary a, AllCTRender ctypes a) => HasMock (Get ctypes a) where
  mock _ = liftIO (generate arbitrary)

The AllCTRender constraint just says “we know how to encode values of type a in the formats listed in the Get combinator”.

And that’s it! You can now actually use all of this to put together a mock server for our little API.

Using mock

All we need to do to run the mock server is call servant-server’s serve function. It is illustrated below, along with all of the code you’d have to write if you were to use this mock-generation feature (aside from language pragmas and imports).

-- 1/ define our user type, deriving the Arbitrary instance
--    since it's just a newtype and we can use the
--    GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving extension. We also
--    derive the Generic class to get our JSON encoding
--    functions for free.
newtype User = User { username :: String }
  deriving (Arbitrary, Generic)

-- 2/ we get the JSON encoding for free
instance ToJSON Generic

-- 3/ recall our API type
type API = "user" :> Get '[JSON] User

-- 4/ define this simple Proxy.
-- for any given type 'a', there's only one value of type 'Proxy a'
-- that is not equivalent to error "foo" and the likes, a real honest value.
-- The way to build this value is to use the Proxy constructor.
-- In other words, this value lets us target one precise type. Servant
-- uses this to tie the type-level information with value-level data.
api :: Proxy API
api = Proxy

-- 5/ we magically derive the mock server.
-- the run function comes from the warp webserver,
-- http://hackage.haskell.org/package/warp
-- 'mock' is the method of the `HasMock` class we've
-- developed in this post.
-- This will run a mock web server with an endpoint at
-- http://localhost:8080/user that generates random values
-- of type User
main :: IO ()
main = run 8080 (serve api $ mock api)

Our little program in action:

$ curl localhost:8080/user
{"username":"Yv\rG\u0014±Ssv\u001e>\u001aVF\u001e\u000fM5ø\u000ctefÚJ\u0001K4"}
# yes, a truly original username.

This is really all you have to do to put together a mock server for an API type. You can find the complete code for this in the work-in-progress servant-mock package on github. The example can be found under example/main.hs there.

There are many more HasMock instances than the ones I have shown here of course – there’s one for all the combinators provided by the servant package! So you can take any API type out there and just create a mock server for it, as long as you provide Arbitrary instances for your data types. Nothing too interesting though, but feel free to take a look at src/Servant/Mock.hs in the repository if you want to read the other instances.

I hope this makes clear how simple writing your own servant interpretation can be, and encourages you to try your hand at it!

Other news

Posted on July 24, 2015 by Alp Mestanogullari